LLM एक जज (judge) के रूप में

You are grading an answer to a farmer's question about crop insurance.
Use ONLY the reference facts below. Answer each check with YES or NO,
then give a one-line reason for each.

1. CORRECT: Every deadline, amount and document mentioned matches the reference facts.
2. COMPLETE: The answer includes the must-include points listed.
3. NO_INVENTION: The answer does not state any scheme, number or rule
   that is missing from the reference facts.
4. LANGUAGE: The answer is in the same language as the question.
5. CLEAR: A farmer with basic reading skills could follow it.

Return JSON: {"CORRECT": "YES|NO", "COMPLETE": ..., "NO_INVENTION": ...,
"LANGUAGE": ..., "CLEAR": ..., "reasons": [...]}

def call_model(prompt: str) -> str:
    ...  # plug in your provider; return the judge's text reply

JUDGE = """Question: {q}
Answer A: {a}
Answer B: {b}
Which answer is more correct and helpful? Ignore length and style.
Reply with exactly one of: A, B, TIE"""

def judge_once(q, first, second):
    reply = call_model(JUDGE.format(q=q, a=first, b=second)).strip().upper()
    return reply if reply in {"A", "B", "TIE"} else "TIE"

def compare(q, ans_x, ans_y):
    r1 = judge_once(q, ans_x, ans_y)   # x shown as A
    r2 = judge_once(q, ans_y, ans_x)   # x shown as B
    if r1 == "A" and r2 == "B":
        return "X"
    if r1 == "B" and r2 == "A":
        return "Y"
    return "TIE"                       # judge changed its mind: no clear winner